Suing for climate change

By ,

Désolé, cet article est seulement disponible en Anglais Américain. Pour le confort de l’utilisateur, le contenu est affiché ci-dessous dans une autre langue. Vous pouvez cliquer le lien pour changer de langue active.

You might recall a recent Federal Court ruling (currently under appeal) that refused to force the government to enforce Canada’s Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act.

Interestingly, a U.S. court ( the Second Circuit of Appeals) ruled last month in Connecticut v. American Electric, that victims of climate change can sue coal-fired electric utilities in common law nuisance.

Of course Canadian courts are only required to follow Canadian case law. But jurisprudence from other common law jurisdictions (including the U.S. , the U.K. and Australia) does have persuasive value. As this Lawyers Weekly article points out, « the essential arguments and responses are equally applicable in Canada. »

It’s a reminder that whether laws are enforced or not large polluters can find themselves on the hook for damages down the line.